Judge denies attempt to stop Trump’s mail voting order
A federal judge said it’s too soon to block President Donald Trump’s latest push to restrict mail voting ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
Anything relating to state and federal courts, court reform, SCOTUS, etc.
A federal judge said it’s too soon to block President Donald Trump’s latest push to restrict mail voting ahead of the 2026 midterm elections.
President Trump’s judicial nominees won’t state the simple fact: Former President Joe Biden won, and, by extension, Trump lost.
Arkansas voters won’t be blocked from registering electronically due to federal appeals court order.
A watchdog group composed of GOP appointees is accusing two liberal candidates of violating rules just two days before key supreme court election.
At Democracy Docket, we’re proud of the enterprise journalism we publish. But some weeks, our focus is simply on keeping our readers up to date with what’s happening.
The Texas Supreme Court has rejected an effort by GOP officials to expel Democratic lawmakers who briefly fled the state last summer in an attempt to prevent Republicans from passing a partisan gerrymander.
At the heart of these cases is the Purcell principle — the idea that courts should avoid changing voting or election rules too close to an election.
Sen. Booker stopped short of saying he would support expanding the number of SCOTUS justices, but doubled-down on saying the court is corrupt.
The Guardian found that Justice Samuel Alito used “misleading” data in determining that Black and white voter turnout rates have reached parity.
Black voters are pressing SCOTUS to apply the Purcell principle of law, which says voting rules and maps shouldn’t be changed too close to an election.