Who Can Access My Voting Information?
As Election Day nears, many people are figuring out when and how they will cast their vote. One question that frequently arises is whether someone — a spouse, a friend, a family member or an employer — can see who you voted for. The short answer is: no.
Read on for more straightforward answers and explanations on how voting privacy works.
Meet the 2024 Pro-Democracy Candidates
Get concise, insightful answers on pro-democracy candidate’s visions and policies as they campaign for crucial seats across various levels of government.
Read on to discover our collection of video and written interviews.
Your Guide to the 2024 Democracy Ballot Initiatives
This November, there are numerous ballot initiatives in a plethora of states that directly impact democracy or voting rights. There are a few themes many of the measures share, including noncitizen voting, ranked choice voting and primary election reforms.
Read on to see to see each initiative summarized by state.
Could The 14th Amendment Kick Trump Off The Ballot?
Former President Donald Trump is currently facing 19 challenges to his eligibility under Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, prohibits the election or appointment of an individual to state or federal office if they previously held such an office, took an oath of office and then “engaged in insurrection or rebellion against the [United States], or given aid or comfort to the enemies thereof.”
Read on to learn about the challenges to Trump’s eligibility.
Trump’s Election Subversion Indictments
Trump has been indicted four times, making him the first former president to ever be criminally indicted. Focusing on Trump’s election subversion indictments, Democracy Docket is tracking the indictment out of special counsel Jack Smith’s office in Washington, D.C. and the indictment from Fulton County District Attorney Fani Willis (D) in Georgia.
Read on to learn about the two election subversion indictments facing Trump.
2024 GOP Presidential Candidates
Here you can find the voting rights and election denialism records of each Republican presidential candidate who has qualified for the debate stage, featuring a tiered system breaking down the severity of each candidate’s record on democracy.
Read on to learn about where the major GOP candidates for president stand on voting rights and democracy.
U.S. Supreme Court
As the highest court in the U.S. federal judiciary, the Supreme Court often has the last say in issues crucial to democracy. Having decided a flurry of landmark cases impacting voting rights and redistricting in the last decade, the Court is as prevalent as ever.
Read on to learn about the landmark voting rights and redistricting cases before the U.S Supreme Court.
The Independent State Legislature Theory
The independent legislature theory is a fringe right-wing theory arguing that state legislatures alone have the power to pass laws regulating federal elections. The theory has become especially prominent in recent years, as it was used in the efforts to overturn the 2020 election and most recently was rejected by the U.S. Supreme Court in Moore v. Harper.
Read on to learn about the independent state legislature theory and what was at stake in Moore.
Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act
Detailing everything you need to know about Section 2 of the VRA, this page highlights the history of Section 2, the battles it has endured and what it means for the future of voting rights, featuring case breakdowns and detailed content from our team.
Read on to learn about Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, why it’s so important and what was at stake in the U.S. Supreme Court case, Allen v. Milligan.
Private Right of Action
A private right of action is a legal concept that allows for an individual or organization to file a lawsuit based on an alleged violation of law and then ask for relief relating to that alleged violation. This page features the court cases and Democracy Docket content relating to the conservative legal movement’s latest target.
Read on to learn what the legal concept “private right of action” means and how conservatives are trying to undermine the enforcement of voting rights protections.
Purcell Principle
The Purcell Principle addresses how soon before an election the courts can change voting or election laws. The principle stems from a 2006 election case, Purcell v. Gonzalez, which ruled that courts must avoid changing the rules so close to an election that it could create confusion for voters and election officials. Since the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been an increased reliance on this principle in election litigation.
Read on to learn about the Purcell principle and how it influences litigation during an election cycle.