California is the new ground zero for free and fair elections
Trump’s obsession with California’s elections is neither entirely new nor surprising.
Read in-depth op-eds on voting rights and democracy from our contributors, guest authors and Democracy Docket's founder, Marc Elias. Use the drop-down menu to organize by topic.
Trump’s obsession with California’s elections is neither entirely new nor surprising.
Voting rights isn’t just a democracy issue, it’s an affordability one.
Under Trump’s second coming, the Foxification of the media has accelerated. Media companies are not just acquiescing to Trump’s coercion; they are actively turning themselves into a pale imitation of a Roger Ailes creation.
In recent years, June has been the time when the high court delivers its most devastating blows against individual rights and the rule of law.
Nearly every other wealthy democracy has taken affirmative steps to make voting easy. In the U.S., it all depends on where you live.
This is how the Voting Rights Act died: not in a fair fight, but in a case engineered to produce a predetermined result.
Alabama’s decision to appeal makes clear that the state’s leaders believe there should be no meaningful curbs on their ability to eviscerate Black political power.
Voters today must demand representatives who will once again restore voting rights and rein in an antidemocratic Court.
The deeper lesson of Callais is not just that we must fight back. It’s that the people who actually live in these states have been fighting all along and all alone.
At the heart of these cases is the Purcell principle — the idea that courts should avoid changing voting or election rules too close to an election.
Page 1 of 55