The Dangerous Asymmetry of Election Denialism
We cannot survive as a democracy if only one party is willing to accept defeat.

We cannot survive as a democracy if only one party is willing to accept defeat.
The nation’s highest court will hear arguments on whether former President Donald Trump is absolutely immune from criminal prosecution over acts that allegedly happened when he was president.
In his bid to be North Carolina’s next governor, Josh Stein is positioning himself as a fierce defender of abortion access for everyone, voting rights and upholding democracy and someone who’s not afraid to fight for what he believes in, even if it puts him at odds with his fellow lawmakers.
Yes, the Supreme Court, another institution of democracy, bent to accommodate Donald J. Trump. Maybe it was the correct decision.
Maricopa County is an unfortunate example of how sheriff elections do not necessarily represent the will of the people.
The people who represent us impact our success personally and as a community in myriad ways.
As we barrel head first into the thick of the 2024 election, Democracy Docket spoke with extremism researchers and experts to discuss threats to election workers.
With the fate of democracy hanging in the balance, we are left wondering whether the courts are up to the task of holding Trump accountable at all.
The Supreme Court docket is long, but for now, at least, it bent toward Trump.
It’s a tale as old as time in Ohio, but Republican officials are again using their authority to thwart efforts to expand the people’s power.