The North Carolina Supreme Court Attacked Democracy in Broad Daylight
Whoever said democracy dies in darkness hasn’t met the new North Carolina Supreme Court.

Read in-depth op-eds on voting rights and democracy from our contributors, guest authors and Democracy Docket's founder, Marc Elias. Use the drop-down menu to organize by topic.
Whoever said democracy dies in darkness hasn’t met the new North Carolina Supreme Court.
With Thomas’ latest betrayal, the curtain has been pulled back and we can no longer blindly trust his or the Court’s independence.
If Republican leaders have had a change of heart about voting by mail, no one has told their lawyers or Republican-controlled legislatures.
It has been roughly one year since two seismic events in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court.
My guiding principle is simple: The public deserves to understand the operations and decisions of its Court.
The outcome in each of these cases is likely to be bad for proponents of redistricting reform. The only question that remains to be answered is: how bad?
In 2016, the Arizona Legislature passed a ban on ballot collection that was aimed at decreasing electoral participation by minorities, especially among the state’s large Latino community.
If it is close enough, the outcome of redistricting litigation may be decisive in who holds the speaker’s gavel on Jan. 3, 2025.
State courts across the country stepped up to protect voters and the integrity of our electoral system. But now those courts are under attack.
North Carolina’s Republican-controlled Legislature has never been shy about abusing its power to undermine free and fair elections.
Page 1 of 6