The Supreme Court Homelessness Case Threatens Our Basic Humanity
If the question is whether cities like Grants Pass are engaging in “cruel and unusual” behavior, this should be an open-and-shut case.
Read in-depth op-eds on voting rights and democracy from our contributors, guest authors and Democracy Docket's founder, Marc Elias. Use the drop-down menu to organize by topic.
If the question is whether cities like Grants Pass are engaging in “cruel and unusual” behavior, this should be an open-and-shut case.
If we want to preserve what we have left we have to acknowledge the very real and present threat and demand champions who will fight back.
With the fate of democracy hanging in the balance, we are left wondering whether the courts are up to the task of holding Trump accountable at all.
The power to appoint judges is yet another critical reason we must continue to invest in electing more Democratic governors.
The Constitution has a provision to protect our democracy in exactly the situation in which we find ourselves right now. We need to use it.
There really is no way for the Court to protect Trump and defend the U.S. Constitution — it must choose and bear the consequences.
While we should take solace in the fact that no prior president has acted as recklessly as Trump, that is not a reason to ignore Section 3 of the 14th Amendment now.
Honor is the Court’s currency, and it can’t function if the nation perceives it as untrustworthy.
We deserve a country where the administration of law reflects not just our hope for justice, but the beauty of our common struggle against racial hierarchy.
In this upcoming case, the Court will decide whether judges or agency experts are better positioned to decide crucial public policy questions.