Anything relating to state and federal courts, court reform, SCOTUS, etc.
Steve Bannon and Mike Johnson welcomed Trump’s comments about taking control of elections. And a new Republican anti-voting bill could disenfranchise millions.
A high-ranking federal appeals judge has dismissed the Justice Department’s misconduct claim against James Boasberg, the chief district judge in Washington, D.C., who warned last year that Trump officials had disregarded his court orders.
This week, President Donald Trump and the GOP kicked their intertwined anti-voting crusades — promoting lies about the 2020 election, and restricting voting in 2026 and beyond — into high gear. And we tracked them every step of the way.
Republicans in the Utah Legislature are at war with the state Supreme Court over a constitutional ban on gerrymandering.
Federal judges have toppled embattled Trump appointee Lindsey Halligan in a ruling accusing her of ignoring court orders and a separate move aimed at stripping her of her self-proclaimed U.S. attorney title.
From California to Virginia, this was a good week for voting rights and fair elections. And we kept you up to date on all of it.
Our team has been digging in on what’s probably the most important ongoing voting story of 2026, which will shape the voting access landscape for the midterms: the unprecedented push by the U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ) to obtain state voter rolls.
Even as the judiciary faces increasing threats of violence, Republicans on the Federal Courts, Oversight, Agency Action and Federal Rights subcommittee levied threats of removal against judges they disagree with.
Peters’ lawyer suggests she might even appeal her case to the U.S. Supreme Court.
It was a tough year for democracy and voting rights, but it wasn’t all bad. The November elections offered more than just a glimmer of hope that next year’s midterms will be a major rebuke of President Donald Trump’s second term.
Page 1 of 15