Stay informed with breaking news updates about voting rights, democracy reform, litigation and legislation.
Two groups representing minority voters in Florida filed a new lawsuit Wednesday seeking to block a pending law that would require voters in the state to prove their citizenship or else lose their right to register to vote and cast a ballot.
Voting rights champion state Rep. Angie Nixon scored a surprise upset in the Florida Democratic U.S. Senate primary Tuesday, setting her up to take on anti-voting hardliner Sen. Ashley Moody in the November general election.
Rep. Byron Donalds (R-Fla.), an election denier and a staunch ally of President Donald Trump, won the Republican primary for Florida governor, becoming the GOP nominee to replace Gov. Ron DeSantis (R).
Sen. Ashley Moody (R-Fla.), a staunch ally of President Donald Trump who has aggressively supported voter-suppression efforts, won Florida’s Republican primary in a special election for the U.S. Senate this November.
When it came time to cast his ballot in Florida’s Republican primary this month, President Donald Trump was more than happy to avail himself of a mail-in ballot.
A dozen Republican states led by Missouri asked the U.S. Supreme Court to let President Donald Trump’s sweeping executive order attacking mail voting go into effect before the midterm elections in November.
Republicans asked a federal judge Tuesday to allow them to intervene in a lawsuit against Florida’s new requirement that voters prove their citizenship before they can cast a ballot.
Sen. Mike Lee (R-Utah) wants the senate to skip its upcoming recess in hopes of passing the anti-voting SAVE America Act.
Pro-voting groups asked a federal appeals court Monday to stop Florida, Ohio, Iowa and Indiana from using the Trump administration’s expanded SAVE database for mass voter screenings.
The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) assured a judge in Washington, D.C., that it was shuttering a controversial citizenship database, but would make the tool available to four Republican-led states on a different judge’s orders. The paradoxical situation emerged after both federal judges issued contradictory rulings on the database, which critics say is ill-suited for voter verification and prone to flagging U.S. citizens as potential noncitizens.
Page 1 of 15