The Future of Partisan Gerrymandering in North Carolina
The impact of the new maps — on state and national politics and on the lives of North Carolinians — will be profound.
Read in-depth op-eds on voting rights and democracy from our contributors, guest authors and Democracy Docket's founder, Marc Elias. Use the drop-down menu to organize by topic.
The impact of the new maps — on state and national politics and on the lives of North Carolinians — will be profound.
Today, the U.S. Supreme Court will hear oral argument in a case that will shape the future of South Carolina’s Black communities.
Republican-controlled legislatures are ignoring the law because they have decided that defiance is good politics.
After 782 days and five bipartisan court strike downs of illegal Republican gerrymanders, Ohio is closing out its 2021 mapping cycle with Democrats caving on maps.
It’s been a rough year for lawyers tasked with defending Republican redistricting maps in court.
Ten years ago, in his landmark opinion in Shelby County v. Holder, Chief Justice John Roberts promised that “our country has changed.”
It appears that Ohio Republicans will get away with having defied seven prior state Supreme Court decisions entirely unscathed.
Writing for a six-justice majority, Chief Justice John Roberts firmly rejected the so-called independent state legislature theory.
It has been roughly one year since two seismic events in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court.
The outcome in each of these cases is likely to be bad for proponents of redistricting reform. The only question that remains to be answered is: how bad?