Appeals court keeps block on New Hampshire voting restrictions
In a win for voters, a federal appeals court kept in place a lower court ruling that blocked key provisions of New Hampshire’s 2024 anti-voting law.
Stay informed with breaking news updates about voting rights, democracy reform, litigation and legislation.
In a win for voters, a federal appeals court kept in place a lower court ruling that blocked key provisions of New Hampshire’s 2024 anti-voting law.
The judge left the door open to possibly ban the law for November’s general election.
New Hampshire is asking the 1st Circuit to quickly trash DOJ’s voter roll grab appeal, saying the department isn’t just wrong about the law, but is also doing a bad job making its case.
A voting rights group sued New Hampshire officials over the state’s new ban on student IDs for voting, arguing the GOP-backed law illegally discriminates against young voters and that the Republican secretary of state exceeded his authority by extending the restriction to voter registration.
New Hampshire asked to pause the ruling while the state’s appeal is pending before the First Circuit Court of Appeals.
In an era of extraordinary partisan polarization, federal judges appointed by presidents of both parties have found common ground on at least one issue: President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice does not have a right to seize state voter rolls.
President Donald Trump’s Department of Justice announced Tuesday that it will send federal election monitors to 15 jurisdictions in six states during the 2026 primary season.
The Department of Justice appealed three more voter roll losses, ensuring that every defeat in President Donald Trump’s nationwide campaign to obtain unredacted state voter data is now in or headed to the federal appeals courts.
The ruling marks the 11th straight loss for the DOJ, which sued 30 states and D.C., in an unprecedented effort to obtain unredacted statewide voter registration lists.
New Hampshire Republicans’ attempt to prevent voters from using signed affidavits to comply with the state’s proof-of-citizenship requirement is unconstitutional, a federal judge ruled Thursday.
Page 1 of 4