Supreme Court must let students use IDs for voting, advocates say
The group argued that if the Supreme Court were to once again change New Hampshire’s rules around student IDs, it would create confusion about voting and disenfranchise voters.
Stay informed with breaking news updates about voting rights, democracy reform, litigation and legislation.
The group argued that if the Supreme Court were to once again change New Hampshire’s rules around student IDs, it would create confusion about voting and disenfranchise voters.
The notice of appeal to the nation’s highest court comes just a day after the 1st Circuit upheld a lower court ruling allowing election officials discretion to consider student IDs to vote.
But the 1st Circuit’s order also did not overturn the lower court’s decision to uphold the broader ban on student IDs for voting.
A federal judge’s ruling may have just thrown President Donald Trump’s scheme to assert control over state voter rolls into turmoil.
The Granite State’s strict voting laws can have a disproportionate impact on students, who are often less experienced with voting and may have recently relocated from out of state.
The state’s appeal will likely create additional confusion for student voters in the Granite State, who already face a variety of obstacles to casting their ballots.
But the judge also barred the state from enforcing a directive that prohibits New Hampshire election officials from accepting a student ID as a valid form of identification to vote.
The DOJ heading to court potentially sets the department up for the next loss in its wildly unsuccessful attempt to gain access to states’ voter rolls.
In a win for voters, a federal appeals court kept in place a lower court ruling that blocked key provisions of New Hampshire’s 2024 anti-voting law.
The judge left the door open to possibly ban the law for November’s general election.
Page 1 of 5