With his popularity plummeting, President Donald Trump took a major step this week aimed at grabbing control of U.S. elections. But in truth, the anti-voting executive order he issued Tuesday only underscored his weakness.
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is claiming key details about its seizure of 2020 election ballots in Fulton County are too sensitive to disclose in court — but one of its top officials may have already laid them out publicly.
Legal experts say the voter suppression diktat may be as strategically foolish as it is doomed.
A narrow majority of Virginia voters say they support Democrats’ redistricting referendum, with 52% of likely voters saying they’re in favor of the measure, according to new poll results from a Washington Post-Schar School survey.
The sudden firing of Attorney General Pam Bondi triggered an immediate scramble within the right wing to identify her replacement — including a push from MAGA influencers to elevate Harmeet Dhillon.
“It’s a Justice Department that has been decimated,” Kristen Clarke told Democracy Docket. “And its ranks are now being filled by people who’ve never enforced federal laws before.”
At least two separate lawsuits were filed by pro-voting organizations against President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting mail-in voting.
Democrats’ lawsuit to block President Donald Trump’s new anti-voting executive order has been assigned to the federal judge who quickly blocked his last executive order on elections.
The decision represents a setback for crucial efforts to hold accountable those working to undermine fair elections.
Democrats sued to block President Donald Trump’s executive order targeting mail-in voting, calling it unconstitutional and designed to rig elections ahead of the 2026 midterms.
Page 1 of 289