How the Supreme Court Bolstered Project 2025
The Supreme Court has recently become a witting or unwitting facilitator of Project 2025’s dystopian agenda for the future.
Read in-depth op-eds on voting rights and democracy from our contributors, guest authors and Democracy Docket's founder, Marc Elias. Use the drop-down menu to organize by topic.
The Supreme Court has recently become a witting or unwitting facilitator of Project 2025’s dystopian agenda for the future.
Each year, this is the month progressive organizations hold our breaths on certain weekday mornings, wondering which life-altering decisions will drop next.
We cannot survive as a democracy if only one party is willing to accept defeat.
If the question is whether cities like Grants Pass are engaging in “cruel and unusual” behavior, this should be an open-and-shut case.
Donald Trump and his Republican allies have no intention of accepting the outcome of a free and fair election.
Even though Arizona Democrats — and two Republican legislators — succeeded in overturning the 1864 law, there is still cause for concern.
In recent weeks, there have been a series of lawsuits aimed at undoing protections for election workers.
If we want to preserve what we have left we have to acknowledge the very real and present threat and demand champions who will fight back.
Yes, the Supreme Court, another institution of democracy, bent to accommodate Donald J. Trump. Maybe it was the correct decision.
The people who represent us impact our success personally and as a community in myriad ways.