Democrats should get on board with Supreme Court expansion – fast
If the current 6-3 Court isn’t bad enough, we may be saddled with an even more entrenched conservative court in short order.
Read in-depth op-eds on voting rights and democracy from our contributors, guest authors and Democracy Docket's founder, Marc Elias. Use the drop-down menu to organize by topic.
If the current 6-3 Court isn’t bad enough, we may be saddled with an even more entrenched conservative court in short order.
Across the country, jail-based voting programs have proven to be successful, including voter registration, education and the creation of polling locations.
The Court rejected the RNC’s scheme to disenfranchise voters. Democracy won.
Here, we have a president who, by his own account, personally called a federal prosecutor to intervene in an ongoing election — and the story has barely registered.
Trump has installed Kurt Olsen, an attorney tied to the software taken through these breaches, at the Department of Justice.
The USPS is proposing a rule that would require states to share information about voters who request mail-in or absentee ballots for federal elections.
We have already sued to block Trump’s anti-voting executive orders. If the USPS adopts an anti-voting rule, we will bring litigation to stop it.
The future of American democracy will not be decided in Washington. It will be decided in state capitols across the country.
What we are witnessing now, however, is a second and more insidious track of that same weaponization — one aimed not at famous individuals who can fight back, but at the unglamorous, under-the-radar groups doing the daily work of democracy.
If Clayton wanted the job, it seems clear that he had to demonstrate loyalty on the one issue Trump cares about most: lying about voting and elections.
Page 1 of 56