Alabama Congressional Redistricting Challenge (SCOTUS)
Allen v. Milligan
Lawsuit decided by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding a challenge to Alabama’s congressional map drawn with 2020 census data under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Learn more about the lawsuits shaping voting rights, redistricting and elections by exploring Democracy Docket’s comprehensive database of cases. Click on any case to find a brief summary of the lawsuit and all relevant filings in the “case documents” section.
Allen v. Milligan
Lawsuit decided by the U.S. Supreme Court regarding a challenge to Alabama’s congressional map drawn with 2020 census data under Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act.
Brooks v. Abbott
Lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of Texas voters and state Sen. Beverly Powell (D) against Texas’ newly-passed state Senate map.
Mexican American Legislative Caucus v. Abbott
Lawsuit filed by MALC in state court challenging how new Texas House districts are drawn.
Mexican American Legislative Caucus v. Texas
Lawsuit filed by MALC challenging Texas’ new congressional, state House and state board of education maps drawn with 2020 census data.
Voto Latino v. Scott
Lawsuit challenging Texas’ new congressional map for diluting minority voting strength.
League of United Latin American Citizens v. Abbott
Lawsuit challenging Texas’ congressional, legislative and board of education redistricting plans.
Singleton v. Allen
Lawsuit challenging Alabama’s congressional map for being malapportioned and a racial gerrymander.
Pico Neighborhood Association v. City of Santa Monica
Lawsuit filed in 2016 on behalf of the Pico Neighborhood Association (PNA), Advocates for Malibu Public Schools (AMPS) and a Latina voter who resides in Santa Monica challenging the at-large method used to elect members to the Santa Monica City Council.
Page 4 of 4