
Ohio Congressional Redistricting Challenge (Neiman)
Neiman v. LaRose
Lawsuit filed on behalf of voters challenging Ohio’s revised congressional map drawn with 2020 census data.
Neiman v. LaRose
Lawsuit filed on behalf of voters challenging Ohio’s revised congressional map drawn with 2020 census data.
League of Women Voters of Utah v. Utah State Legislature
Lawsuit challenging Utah’s new congressional map following the release of 2020 census data.
Gonidakis v. Ohio Redistricting Commission
Lawsuit filed in federal court on behalf of Ohio voters after the Ohio Redistricting Commission failed to adopt new legislative districts.
Republican Party of New Mexico v. Oliver
Lawsuit filed by Republicans challenging New Mexico’s congressional map drawn with 2020 census data.
Graham v. Adams
Lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of voters and the Kentucky Democratic Party challenging Kentucky’s new state House and congressional maps.
Fossella v. Adams
Lawsuit filed on behalf of a group of Republican voters and officials representing New York at the local and federal levels challenging New York City’s new noncitizen voting law.
Arkansas State Conference NAACP v. Arkansas Board of Apportionment
Lawsuit filed on behalf of the Arkansas State Conference NAACP and Arkansas Public Policy Panel challenging Arkansas’ new state House map passed following the release of 2020 census data.
Skagway Borough v. Alaska Redistricting Board
Lawsuit filed on behalf of the municipality of Skagway Borough and one of its residents against the Alaska Redistricting Board challenging the state’s new legislative districts.
Valdez v. Alaska Redistricting Board
Lawsuit filed on behalf of the city of Valdez and one of its residents against the Alaska Redistricting Board challenging Alaska’s new legislative districts.
Matanuska-Susitna Borough v. Alaska Redistricting Board
Lawsuit brought by Matanuska-Susitna Borough challenging Alaska’s newly-drawn state House districts following the release of 2020 census data.