Trump Pulls National Guard from Los Angeles, Ends Attempted Deployments in Portland and Chicago

President Donald Trump announced Wednesday that he was ending his National Guard deployment in Los Angeles and his attempted military takeovers in Chicago and Portland.

Trump’s retreat on the last day of 2025 came just a week after the Supreme Court upheld a lower court ruling halting his efforts to send hundreds of Guard troops into Chicago.

A majority of the justices agreed with a district court’s finding that Trump did not have the authority to invoke an archaic and rarely used law to federalize Illinois Guard soldiers for the Windy City deployment.

Though the Supreme Court’s decision was limited to Chicago, legal experts noted that the ruling undermined Trump’s attempted deployment in Portland and his active deployment in Los Angeles, which has been ongoing since early June.

While announcing the end of the deployments, Trump threatened to return to major Democratic-led cities and states.

“We will come back, perhaps in a much different and stronger form, when crime begins to soar again,” he wrote on Truth Social. “Only a question of time!”

Trump’s pullback from the deployments should clear the way for the Democratic governors of California, Illinois and Oregon to regain control of hundreds of their Guard troops currently under federal command.

“We’ve long known the federalization of [the California National Guard] is illegal,” California Gov. Gavin Newsom’s office said on social media Wednesday.

In his announcement, Trump falsely credited the deployments with curbing crime.

Federal law prohibits troops — including federalized Guard troops — from performing routine policing activities under normal circumstances. 

A federal judge in California earlier this year found that Trump’s use of the military in Los Angeles violated the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878, which is meant to prevent soldiers from enforcing laws. 

And Trump’s attempted deployments in Chicago and Portland couldn’t have influenced crime rates in those cities because federal judges barred the Guard troops from ever taking to the streets.

Trump’s attempt to link the deployments to crime instead stems from his long-held desire to use the military as his own national police force. 

In threatening to return in a “different and stronger form,” Trump appears to be hinting at using the traditional U.S. military — such as the Army, Navy and Air Force.

Since the start of his second term, Trump has repeatedly threatened to invoke the Insurrection Act. One of the executive branch’s strongest emergency powers, the act permits the president to deploy traditional military troops to enforce laws in certain emergency situations.

Through his National Guard deployments, Trump attempted to claim Insurrection Act-like powers using a separate statute, 10 U.S.C. 12406 (Title 10).

Title 10 allows the president to take control of state Guard troops when the country faces foreign invasion, when the U.S. government faces rebellion or when the president is unable to execute laws with “regular forces.”

In defending the deployments, the Department of Justice (DOJ) claimed that courts couldn’t review Trump’s authority to federalize Guard troops, that Guard deployments could last as long as the president deemed necessary and that those troops could enforce laws.

Last week, the Supreme Court largely rejected those arguments. It said Trump lacked authority to federalize Illinois Guard troops under Title 10 because the term “regular forces” in the law referred to the traditional forces of the U.S. military and not, as the DOJ claimed, law enforcement officials.

Because Trump never attempted to enforce laws with the traditional military — which would require invocation of the Insurrection Act — Trump couldn’t federalize Guard troops for a deployment in Chicago, the court determined.

“At this preliminary stage, the Government has failed to identify a source of authority that would allow the military to execute the laws in Illinois,” the court said. “The President has not invoked a statute that provides an exception to the Posse Comitatus Act.”

This story has been updated with additional information throughout.