RNC, state GOP rush to defend North Carolina’s last-minute mail ballot restrictions
State and national Republicans are thrusting themselves into a federal lawsuit challenging restrictive mail ballot rules in North Carolina.
Stay informed with breaking news updates about voting rights, democracy reform, litigation and legislation.
State and national Republicans are thrusting themselves into a federal lawsuit challenging restrictive mail ballot rules in North Carolina.
Some North Carolina voters only have a week left to ensure they can cast a ballot in the midterms as a result of a shady settlement the state elections board made with Trump’s Justice Department.
Mail voting in North Carolina is well underway, but voting rights groups warn some votes may not be counted if two restrictive rules remain in effect.
The U.S. Supreme Court Friday greenlit a flawed Trump administration database for purging voters from the rolls. And plenty of major news outlets were eager to downplay the decision’s importance.
North Carolina’s last-minute restrictions on absentee ballots will lead to “arbitrary disenfranchisement,” pro-voter groups* argue in a lawsuit filed Tuesday.
North Carolina’s second-highest court blessed a Republican power grab Wednesday, ruling that a 2024 law transferring control of the State Board of Elections from the Democratic governor to the Republican state auditor did not violate the state’s constitution.
Hours before sending out absentee ballots to voters, North Carolina pushed through its latest restrictions that could make it harder for those votes to count.
The U.S. Postal Service signed off on North Carolina’s mail ballots, making it one of the first states to be approved under a new Trump administration plan that would restrict voting by mail.
Democracy Docket was created to track the legal battles over voting rights more closely than any other news outlet — offering up-to-the-minute information on where things stand for Americans’ access to the ballot.
A slate of anti-voting measures in North Carolina is unlikely to take effect before the November midterms because the public raised enough objections to trigger a review by state lawmakers.