The should-be state of District of Columbia

DOJ Election Monitors Records Challenge (NAACP)

NAACP v. Dhillon

A pro-voting lawsuit seeking records regarding DOJ’s plans to deploy “election monitors” for the 2026 midterms.

Background

The National Association for the Advancement of Colored People (NAACP) sued Harmeet Dhillon — in her official capacity as Assistant Attorney General of the Civil Rights Division of the U.S. Department of Justice — for failing to respond to Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests regarding the DOJ’s efforts to deploy election monitors throughout the country for the 2026 midterms. The NAACP filed their FOIA requests shortly after Dhillon’s claims that the DOJ is going to send 1,000 monitors to polling sites during the 2026 midterms. The NAACP alleges that the DOJ’s “election monitor” program has shifted from ensuring states’ compliance with voting rights laws to “searching for evidence related to unfounded claims of widespread voter fraud.” The FOIA requests seek records justifying the increased number of election monitors at polling places and records identifying deployment locations for election monitors, plans to use ICE or other federal law enforcement officers in this role, qualifications of election monitors, and any training materials, among other information relevant for the 2026 midterm elections. The lawsuit seeks expedited production of the records before Nov. 3.

Why it matters

The NAACP asserts that “Courts have recognized that unnecessary law enforcement and government presence at polling sites can cause fear, create confusion, impose burdens on election officials, and have a chilling or coercive effect on voters.” This comes after Wyoming’s governor described election monitors from the DOJ in the state’s 2026 primary elections as “aggressive” and “irregular,” noting that their behavior seemed to be outside the scope of what Congress has designated to them.

Latest Updates:

  • Oct. 2nd, 2026: Plaintiffs filed their complaint.

Case Documents