The U.S. Supreme Court’s Supreme Takeover
As the final decisions of the term dropped, it was clear this Court is as extreme as ever.
Rakim H. D. Brooks is a public interest appellate lawyer and the president of Alliance for Justice (AFJ), a national association of over 150 organizations building power, transforming courts, and securing justice for all. Before joining AFJ as its president, Brooks worked at the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) as senior campaign manager for the ACLU’s Systemic Equality Campaign and recently served as a member of the Biden-Harris transition team. In addition to leading AFJ, Brooks sits on the advisory board for the Brown Center for the Study of Slavery and Justice and Getting Out, Staying Out in his native East Harlem. Brooks clerked for Justice Edwin Cameron on the Constitutional Court of South Africa and at the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and the D.C. Circuit. He has an A.B. from Brown University; a M.Phil in Politics from the University of Oxford, where he was a Rhodes scholar and a J.D. and M.B.A. from Yale Law School and the Yale School of Management. As a contributor to Democracy Docket, Brooks writes about issues relating to our state and federal courts as well as reforms to our judicial systems.
As the final decisions of the term dropped, it was clear this Court is as extreme as ever.
Texas Republicans are taking a hardline against corruption in their state. You read that right.
With Thomas’ latest betrayal, the curtain has been pulled back and we can no longer blindly trust his or the Court’s independence.
It has been roughly one year since two seismic events in the history of the U.S. Supreme Court.
My guiding principle is simple: The public deserves to understand the operations and decisions of its Court.
We deserve a forward-thinking judiciary filled with movement lawyers who want to see progress for our nation.
Page 2 of 2